Sheetz
Sheetz v. County of El Dorado
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 10/19/
CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
(El Dorado) ----
GEORGE SHEETZ, C093682
Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. PC20170255)
v.
COUNTY OF EL DORADO,
Defendant and Respondent.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of El Dorado County, Dylan Sullivan, Judge. Affirmed.
FisherBroyles, Paul James Beard II, Matthew Howard Weiner for Plaintiff and Appellant.
Abbott & Kindermann, Glen C. Hansen; David Anthony Livingston, County Counsel for Defendant and Respondent.
1 This is a land-use regulation case. Plaintiff George Sheetz challenges the $23,420 traffic impact mitigation fee (TIM fee or fee) imposed by defendant El Dorado County (County) as a condition of issuing him a building permit for the construction of a single- family residence on his property in Placerville. Sheetz appeals from the judgment entered after the trial court sustained the County’s demurrer without leave to amend and denied his verified petition for writ of mandate. He contends reversal is required because the TIM fee is invalid under both the…