Mendez-Villegas

Mendez-Villegas v. Duarte Nursery CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 20, 2022F081733California3,914 words

Opinion

Opinion

FACTS

GENERAL BACKGROUND

On April 22, 2015, Plaintiffs filed a class action complaint against defendants (1) Duarte Nursery, Inc. (DNI); (2) Michael Duarte; (3) Jeff Duarte; (4) John Duarte; (5) Patricia Lopez; and (6) Engracia Lopez. The original complaint stated seven causes of action against DNI arising from violations of the Labor Code and a violation of the unfair competition law (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17200 et seq.). An eighth cause of action stated a PAGA claim against all defendants. Plaintiffs filed the operative first amended class action complaint (FAC) on August 12, 2015. The FAC stated the same causes of action but removed Michael Duarte as a defendant. Defendants2 filed their operative second amended answer on December 28, 2015. According to the record, the parties litigated discovery disputes in 2018 over Defendants “unaltered” timekeeping data that culminated in the trial court granting a motion to compel production of documents on July 31, 2018. Following this, Plaintiffs’ database expert, Aaron Woolfson, visited DNI’s facility on December 8, 2018.

PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION

On December 12, 2019, Plaintiffs moved for class certification pursuant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.