People v. Peek CA2/5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 24, 2022B310103California3,752 words

Opinion

Opinion

Baker, J.

I. BACKGROUND

A. The Offense Conduct, as Established by the Evidence at Trial 1. California Market robbery Madan Kiratirai (Kiratirai) testified he was working at California Market, a convenience store in Whittier, on the evening of April 2, 2020. A man Kiratirai had seen before—and who had been banned from the store because “he had done some other things”—entered. Kiratirai asked the man to leave and picked up a phone to call the police. The man jumped over a counter and punched Kiratirai several times. Kiratirai fell to the ground and the man kicked him. The man took several packs of cigarettes and left the store.

2 When the prosecution asked Kiratirai whether his attacker was in the courtroom, Kiratirai responded, “Everybody wearing masks, so I can’t say.” The trial court followed up by asking Kiratirai whether he saw anyone in the courtroom resembling his attacker, “even though you’re not sure because everyone is wearing a facial covering[.]” Kiratirai responded, “Yeah, I think so,” and identified defendant. The trial court asked whether it would “help . . . if that person removed his mask.” Kiratirai said yes, but gave no reply when defendant lowered his mask and the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.