Zeidenfeld

Zeidenfeld v. Stetler CA2/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 24, 2022B308360MCalifornia8,784 words

Opinion

Opinion

Bendix, J.

Filed 10/24/22 Zeidenfeld v. Stetler CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

ALVIN ZEIDENFELD, B308360

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 20STCV02079) v.

ORDER MODIFYING

DAVID STETLER et al., OPINION AND DENYING

PETITION FOR

Defendants and Appellants. REHEARING (NO CHANGE

IN JUDGMENT)

THE COURT:

The opinion filed October 3, 2022 is modified as follows: (1) On page 26, in the last paragraph, the following text is deleted: “We observe that Copp may no longer be persuasive in light of the United States Supreme Court’s limitation of Gertz in Milkovich. Assuming Copp remains viable” (2) …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.