People v. Espinoza CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 25, 2022H048940California963 words

Opinion

Opinion

Grover, J.

Filed 10/25/22 P. v. Espinoza CA6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

THE PEOPLE, H048940

(Monterey County Plaintiff and Respondent, Super. Ct. No. 19CR005138)

v.

ADAN ESPINOZA,

Defendant and Appellant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

We resolve this case by memorandum opinion pursuant to California Standards of Judicial Administration, Title 8, Standard 8.1. (See also People v. Garcia (2002) 97 Cal.App.4th 847, 853-855.) Defendant appeals from an order terminating probation and imposing a jail sentence that was deemed served based on presentence custody credits. Defendant was charged with felony resisting or deterring an executive officer (Pen. Code, § 69) in 2018 in Santa Clara County Superior Court. (The facts…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.