Hogrefe

Hogrefe v. County of Trinity CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 25, 2022C093344California7,359 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 10/25/22 Hogrefe v. County of Trinity CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Trinity) ----

RANDOLPH HOGREFE, C093344

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. 20CV085)

v.

COUNTY OF TRINITY et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

As a young child, plaintiff Randolph Hogrefe testified as an eyewitness to the murder of Gary “Hop” Summar, leading to the conviction of murder suspect Robert Fenenbock. (People v. Fenenbock (1996) 46 Cal.App.4th 1688 (Fenenbock).) Nearly 30 years later, Hogrefe submitted a tort claim under the Government Claims Act (Gov. Code, § 810, et seq. (Act); further undesignated statutory references are to the Government Code) to respondent County of Trinity (County), alleging that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.