Farmdale Creamery v. Department of Food and Agriculture CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 25, 2022C093013California4,527 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 10/25/22 Farmdale Creamery v. Department of Food and Agriculture CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento) ----

FARMDALE CREAMERY, INC., C093013

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. 34202080003332CUWMGDS) v.

DEPARTMENT OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE,

Defendant and Respondent.

SAVE QIP DAIRY FARMERS,

Intervener and Respondent.

Farmdale Creamery, Inc. (Farmdale) appeals the trial court’s denial of its petition for writ of mandate, in which Farmdale challenged the Department of Food and Agriculture’s (department) directive to pay $363,053.85, 1 comprised of a $4,792.

The department ordered Farmdale to pay $364,367.39. In its petition for writ of mandate, however, Farmdale did not (and, on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.