Via Appia v. Marcus & Millichap Real Estate Investment etc. CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 25, 2022F081598California469 words

Opinion

Opinion

Franson, J.

Filed 10/25/22 Via Appia v. Marcus & Millichap Real Estate Investment etc. CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

VIA APPIA, LLC,

F081598

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. 10684) v.

MARCUS & MILLICHAP REAL ESTATE OPINION INVESTMENT SERVICES, INC. et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Mariposa County. F. Dana Walton, Judge. Newmeyer & Dillion, Alan H. Packer and Brandon A. Clouse; The Ware Practice Group, Mindy L. Ware and James Ware for Plaintiff and Appellant. Neumiller & Beardslee, Paul N. Balestracci and Ricardo Z. Aranda for Defendants and Respondents. -ooOoo-

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

Plaintiff Via Appia, LLC appeals from a postjudgment order awarding attorney fees to defendants Marcus &…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.