Taft v. Bhajal CA5
Opinion
Opinion
Poochigian, J.
Filed 10/25/22 Taft v. Bhajal CA5
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
FOSTER TAFT,
F082305
Plaintiff and Appellant, (Tulare Super. Ct. No. VCU283752) v.
SUKHVINDER BHAJAL, OPINION Defendant and Respondent.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tulare County. Nathan D. Ide, Judge. Foster Taft, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant. Salinas Law Group, Richard S. Salinas, and Stacy R. Lucas, for Defendant and Respondent. -ooOoo- The trial court sustained a demurrer to plaintiff and appellant Foster Taft’s (Taft) operative pleading without leave to amend. We conclude that neither issue preclusion nor claim preclusion support a demurrer and reverse the judgment of dismissal. Case No. 268870 On August 18, 2017, Taft…