Taft v. Boston Scientific CA5
Opinion
Opinion
Poochigian, J.
Filed 10/25/22 Taft v. Boston Scientific CA5
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
FOSTER TAFT,
F082300
Plaintiff and Appellant, (Tulare Super. Ct. No. VCU268870) v.
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION et al., OPINION Defendants and Respondents.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tulare County. Nathan D. Ide, Judge. Foster Taft, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant. Shook, Hardy & Bacon, Frank C. Rothrock, Eva M. Weiler, and Mayela C. Montenegro-Urch for Defendant and Respondent, Boston Scientific Corporation. Salinas Law Group, Richard S. Salinas, and Stacy R. Lucas for Defendant and Respondent, Sukhvinder Bhajal, M.D. -ooOoo- Plaintiff and appellant Foster Taft has filed four complaints seeking to allege viable causes of action…