Tahir

Tahir v. Shah CA2/4

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 27, 2022B312028California3,614 words

Opinion

Opinion

Collins, J.

Filed 10/26/22 Tahir v. Shah CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

ABU TAHIR, B312028

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. VC067211) v.

RAFIQ SHAH,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Olivia Rosales, Judge. Affirmed. Abu Tahir, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant. Law Office of Henry B. LaTorraca and Henry B. LaTorraca for Defendant and Respondent. Appellant Abu Tahir and respondent Rafiq Shah entered into a contract in 2012 regarding their purchase of a market and its subsequent operation by their corporate entity, H.P. Palomino, Inc. (Palomino). In 2018, Tahir filed a breach of contract action in Los Angeles…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.