People v. Morcos CA2/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 27, 2022B319289California4,907 words

Opinion

Opinion

Bendix, J.

Filed 10/26/22 P. v. Morcos CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

THE PEOPLE, B319289

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. PA094334) v.

HADY WAEL MORCOS,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Cynthia L. Ulfig and Michael Terrell, Judges. Affirmed. Law Offices of Gregory Rubel and Gregory Rubel for Defendant and Appellant. Rob Bonta, Attorney General, Lance E. Winters, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Susan Sullivan Pithey, Assistant Attorney General, Noah P. Hill and Stephanie A. Miyoshi, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent. ____________________________ In March 2020, the People filed a complaint alleging…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.