In re Bo.U. CA2/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 27, 2022B314447California1,507 words

Opinion

Opinion

Bendix, J.

facts as well as the law, and a reviewing court may make use of statements therein as admissions against the party.’ ”].) Undesignated statutory citations are to the Welfare and Institutions Code.

3 places the children at risk of serious physical harm, damage, danger and failure to protect.” On January 22, 2018, the juvenile court held a detention hearing. The court detained Bo.U. and Ba.U. from mother,4 released them to father, and authorized mother to have monitored visits with the children. On April 19, 2018, the juvenile court held a combined jurisdiction and disposition hearing. The court sustained the dependency petition, removed the children from mother’s custody and placed them with father, authorized mother to have monitored visits with the children, and ordered mother to participate in certain services. On October 18, 2018, April 18, 2019, November 13, 2019, November 19, 2020, and July 6, 2021, the juvenile court held status review hearings pursuant to section 364.5 At the

At the conclusion of the prior dependency proceedings, the juvenile court awarded father sole legal and physical custody of the children, and mother monitored visitation. Thus, although the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.