People v. Kardasz CA2/7
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 28, 2022B317551California112 words
Opinion
DISCUSSION
We appointed counsel to represent Kardasz in this appeal. After reviewing the record, counsel filed a brief raising no issues. Appointed counsel advised Kardasz on September 22, 2022 that he could personally submit any contentions or issues he wanted the court to consider. We have received no response. We have examined the record and are satisfied appellate counsel for Kardasz has complied with counsel’s responsibilities and there are no arguable issues. (Smith v. Robbins (2000) 528 U.S. 259, 277-284; People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 118- 119; People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441-442.)
DISPOSITION
The judgment is affirmed.
PERLUSS, P. J.
We concur:
SEGAL, J.
FEUER, J.
3