Marriage of Sholtis CA2/8

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 28, 2022B322740California2,034 words

Opinion

Opinion

INTRODUCTION

Robert Sholtis (Robert) appeals from the Family Court’s May 29, 2019 order denying his post-judgment Request For Order (RFO) on several issues—modification of child custody, visitation, child support, property control, child tax credit, psychological therapy for alleged child abuse, possession of child’s passport, and attorney’s fees and costs—against his now former wife Isabella V. Biasutto (Isabella).1 Robert presents many arguments on appeal. Because he has not provided an adequate record on appeal or sufficient argument or citation to legal authority to support his contentions, we find his appeal forfeited. We affirm the order denying his RFO.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

We glean the following information from the scanty record provided us, which includes two minute orders, orders after hearing from the year 2009, the reporter’s transcript for hearings held January 8, 2009 and April 30, 2019, the register of actions (i.e., case summary), and the court’s May 29, 2019 ruling that forms the basis of this appeal. On November 7, 2008, Isabella filed a petition in Santa Clara Superior Court for dissolution of her marriage to Robert, with whom she shares one…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.