Hickey

United States v. Hickey

Good Law
400 F.3d 658
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 8, 2005Nos. 02-10197, 02-10204California85 words

Lead Opinion

The opinion is amended as follows: (a) the paragraph in section V that begins “Hickey’s arguments meet none of the criteria” is deleted; (b) the first word of the next paragraph is deleted so that the sentence reads “The district court did not resolve an ‘important issue’ ”; and (c) the following footnote is inserted at the end of the sentence:

With these changes the petition for rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are denied. No further petition for rehearing will be entertained.