Freeman

Freeman v. San Diego Ass'n of Realtors

Good Law
322 F.3d 1133·2003 WL 931834·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2148·2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 4091
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 10, 2003Nos. 01-56199, 01-56231California10,471 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Kozinski, J.

*1140 OPINION

Competition is the mainspring of a capitalist economy. Sometimes, however, cooperation can make markets more efficient; setting industry standards and pooling market data are two examples of arrangements that often benefit consumers. Antitrust laws acknowledge these benefits, but still treat the arrangements with skepticism, for seemingly benign agreements may conceal highly anticom-petitive schemes. We apply these principles to a case involving a real estate Multiple Listing Service.

Background

Real estate agents make a living matching buyers and sellers. Up-to-date information about properties on the market is a must. Long gone are the days when agents trawled the neighborhood on horseback in search of telltale “For Sale” signs. We’re now in the era of the Multiple Listing Service, or “MLS,” which lets agents share information about properties on the market with the help of a computerized database. Agents who subscribe to the MLS can peruse the listings of other subscribers and post their own.

Care and feeding of an MLS involves more than just maintaining a database. Someone must enroll new MLS subscribers, bill and collect payments, ensure that postings…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.