Deutsch

Deutsch v. Turner Corp.

Good Law

324 F.3d 692·2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 3937

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 21, 2003Nos. 00-56673, 01-17115, 01-17116, 01-17123, 01-17124, 01-17134, 01-17155, 01-17157, 01-17160, 01-17172, 01-17176, 01-17177, 01-17185, 01-17189, 01-17195, 01-17197, 01-17201, 01-17203, 01-17204, 01-17207, 01-17210, 01-17211, 01-17230, 01-17243, 01-17251, 01-17252, 01-17260, 01-17265, 01-17499California9,649 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Reinhardt, J.

ORDER

The opinion filed January .21, 2003 is hereby amended as follows:

1. Slip op. at 991, second full paragraph, line 6, after “because a state is,” insert “generally.”

2. Slip op. at 991, replace the last sentence (beginning “Because section 354.6 is substantive law”), including footnote 4, with the following:

3. Immediately following the passage inserted above (after “under our enemies’ protection”) add a new footnote containing the following text: *703 Two decisions of the California Court of Appeal, one by the Second Appellate District and one by the Fourth, have recently addressed whether section 354.6 is substantive or procedural in nature. The decisions reached opposite conclusions. Compare Mitsubishi Materials Corp. v. Superior Court, 130 Cal.Rptr.2d 734 , 2003 WL 253877 , slip op. at 2 (Cal.Ct.App.2003) (“The legislation actually creates a state law claim which otherwise would not exist ....”) with Taiheiyo Cement Corp. v. Superior Court, 129 Cal. Rptr.2d 451 , 2003 WL 124284 , slip op. at 24 (Cal.Ct.App.2003) (“The sole purpose of section 354.6 is to extend the statute of limitations for common law claims for unpaid labor and, personal injuries arising out of slave…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.