Bear Lake Watch, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Good Law
324 F.3d 1071
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 27, 2003No. 02-70660California3,084 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Fernandez, J.

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission decided that because a reservoir was not necessary or appropriate to the operation of power projects, it did not have jurisdiction over that reservoir, even though it did have jurisdiction over the power projects themselves. 1 Bear Lake Watch, Inc. disagreed with that decision, and has petitioned for review of it. We deny the petition.

BACKGROUND

In 1909, Telluride Power Company began action to develop Bear Lake as a reservoir, and in 1911 to 1912 it obtained the right to direct water from Bear River into the lake. Water is withdrawn from the river, and when needed downstream, it is pumped out of the lake at the Lifton Pump Station and returned to the river. Telluride undertook the project in order to store water for irrigation and power purposes.

' Disputes later arose between Telluride’s successors in interest and various other entities, which had a claim on Bear River water. Litigation, agreements, and an interstate compact followed. The result was that the rights of Telluride’s successors to store and use the Bear River water at Bear Lake was recognized as long as that did not interfere with any senior users’ rights.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.