KP Permanent Make-Up, Inc. v. Lasting Impression I, Inc.

Good Law
2002 Daily Journal DAR 4735·328 F.3d 1061·2003 WL 1983821·66 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1509·2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 8124
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 30, 2003No. 01-56055California4,764 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Hug, J.

I. Introduction

This case concerns the term “micro colors” 1 and who has the right to use it. *1065 Lasting Impression I, Inc., owns an incontestable, registered trademark which .consists of the term “micro colors,” set in white, within a black box. It is the registration for this composite mark that is the basis of this litigation.

K.P. Permanent Make-Up, Inc. (“KP”) uses the term “micro colors” on its products and brochures. Upon receiving a cease and desist letter from Lasting Impression I, Inc. in January 2000 demanding KP discontinue its use of the term “micro color,” KP brought this action for declaratory relief against the defendants Lasting Impression I, Inc., and its distributor, MCN International, Inc. (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Lasting”). KP asserted that Lasting did not have the exclusive right to use the term “micro colors” and that the term was generic and incapable of receiving trademark protection. Lasting counterclaimed, alleging that KP’s use of the term “micro color” infringed Lasting’s incontestable, registered mark. The parties filed cross motions for summary judgment and summary adjudication.

The district court concluded that the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.