Mena

Mena v. City of Simi Valley

Bad Law
332 F.3d 1255·2003 WL 21436012
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 23, 2003No. 01-56673California6,295 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Pregerson, J.

Iris Mena brought this action in the district court under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 , alleging that Robert Brill and Darin L. Muehler, both City of Simi Valley police officers, used excessive force and restrained her for an unreasonable period of time during a search of her home. The officers appeal the district court’s judgment entered on a jury verdict. They argue that the district court erred in ruling that they are not entitled to qualified immunity. Additionally, the officers contend that they are entitled to a new trial on the unlawful detention claim because the district court abused its discretion (1) in denying the officers’ proposed instruction on unlawful detention; (2) through its conduct during voir dire; and (3) through its cross-examination of defense witnesses during trial. The officers also argue that the award of punitive damages to Mena should be vacated as unsupported by substantial evidence. We have jurisdiction to hear this appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

Facts and Procedural Background

Just before 7:00 a.m. on February 3, 1998, several officers from the Simi Valley Police Department (SVPD) SWAT team *1260 executed a valid search warrant at…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.