Kremen

Kremen v. Cohen

Good Law
2003 Daily Journal DAR 8245·337 F.3d 1024·2003 WL 21715318·67 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1502·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6565
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 25, 2003No. 01-15899California5,875 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Kozinski, J.

We decide whether Network Solutions may be liable for giving away a registrant’s domain name on the basis of a forged letter.

Background

“Sex on the Internet?,” they all said. “That’ 11 never make any money.” But computer-geek-turned-entrepreneur Gary Kremen knew an opportunity when he saw it. The year was 1994; domain names were free for the asking, and it would be several years yet before Henry Blodget and hordes of eager NASDAQ day traders would turn the Internet into the Dutch tulip craze of our times. With a quick email to the domain name registrar Network Solutions, Kremen became the proud owner of sex.com. He registered the name to his business, Online Classifieds, and listed himself as the contact.

Con man Stephen Cohen, meanwhile, was doing time for impersonating a bankruptcy lawyer. He, too, saw the potential of the domain name. Kremen had gotten it first, but that was only a minor impediment for a man of Cohen’s boundless resource and bounded integrity. Once out of prison, he sent Network Solutions what purported to be a letter he had received from Online Classifieds. It claimed the company had been “forced to dismiss Mr. Kremen,” but “never got around to changing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.