Dannenberg

Dannenberg v. Valadez

Good Law
2003 Daily Journal DAR 8954·338 F.3d 1070·2003 WL 21886203·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7111·2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 16360
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 11, 2003No. 02-16273California2,331 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Breyer, J.

In March 2000, a jury entered a verdict in favor of plaintiff-appellee John Dannen-berg, a California state prison inmate, against four prison officials for violating Dannenberg’s constitutional rights by punishing him for engaging in protected activity while in prison. The jury awarded Dannenberg $9,000 in damages, and the district court subsequently entered an injunction ordering that certain materials be expunged from Dannenberg’s prison record. The court then granted Dannen-berg’s motion for attorneys’ fees incurred subsequent to enactment of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”) in the amount of $57,566.25.

This appeal followed, challenging only the amount of the attorneys’ fees award. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 .

BACKGROUND

WTiile an inmate at the California Medical Facility State Prison (“CMF”) in Vaca-ville, California in 1994 and 1995, appellee John Dannenberg assisted another inmate to litigate, successfully, a petition for a writ of mandate to restore the inmate’s family visitation rights. Thirty-four days after securing the writ, Dannenberg was placed in administrative segregation and all of his legal papers confiscated on the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.