Western Pioneer, Inc. v. International Specialty, Inc.

Good Law
339 F.3d 1137
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 13, 2003No. 02-35534California308 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

This admiralty action arises out of the collision in the Puget Sound between the Bowfin, owned by Western Pioneer, and the barge Lucky Buck, owned by Claimant Signature Seafoods. Western Pioneer initiated this Limitation of Liability Act 1 proceeding following the collision. The district court held that Western Pioneer was entitled to limit its liability under the Act. We affirm.

The Limitation of Liability Act limits shipowner liability arising from the unseaworthiness of the shipowner’s vessel or the negligence of the vessel’s crew unless the condition of unseaworthiness or the act of negligence was within the shipowner’s “privity or knowledge.” 2 The shipowner has the burden of proving that the act or condition was outside its privity or knowledge after the claimant first establishes what act or condition caused the loss. 3 In this case, the district court found that the sole proximate cause of the collision was “spontaneous negligent navigational errors” of the master of the tug and not the master’s fatigue (for which the Claimants urged Western Pioneer was responsible). That finding is not clearly erroneous.

We reject the Claimants’ contention that, by admitting that its…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.