Green

Green v. City of Tucson

Good Law
340 F.3d 891·2003 WL 21976503
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 20, 2003No. 02-16700California6,057 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Fisher, J.

Plaintiffs are residents and qualified voters of a community known as Tortolita, located in Pima County, Arizona. In 1997, an overwhelming majority of Tortolita’s qualified voters petitioned the Pima County Board of Supervisors to incorporate Tortolita as a new municipality. Arizona law, however, prohibits the incorporation of a community unless all existing municipalities of 5,000 or more inhabitants within six miles of the community’s boundaries give their prior consent. See Ariz.Rev. Stat. § 9-101.01. The City of Tucson and the Towns of Maraña and Oro Valley (“Defendants”) each has 5,000 or more inhabitants and lies within six miles of the boundaries of Tortolita. All three municipalities have opposed Tortolita’s incorporation. Plaintiffs brought the present § 1983 action against Defendants, claiming that the consent requirement of § 9-101.01 violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment because it unjustifiably burdens their right to vote on municipal incorporation. 1 Plaintiffs argue that the right to petition for incorporation granted by Arizona law is the constitutional equivalent of the right to vote and is therefore protected by the Equal Protection…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.