Greene

Greene v. Sprint Communications Co.

Good Law
340 F.3d 1047·2003 WL 21999367
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 25, 2003No. 02-56339California2,543 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Rymer, J.

Is there a private right of action to recover damages for violating regulations promulgated by the Federal Communica *1049 tions Commission (FCC) pursuant to § 276 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 that require interexchange carriers to compensate payphone service providers for “dial-around” telephone calls made from their payphones? The district court held that there was not, and we agree. We therefore affirm dismissal of an action by Zane Greene and other payphone service providers against Sprint Communications Company, a long-distance telecommunications carrier, and several of its facilities-based resellers (collectively, Sprint).

I

Payphone service providers (PSPs) own payphones made available to the public. Sometimes they are paid directly by the caller, as when coins are deposited into the payphone; other times, they receive commission payments from the carrier to which 0 + calls are automatically routed by a presubscription agreement. However, access code calls and toll free calls are coinless calls. These calls are initiated over a PSP payphone and are routed over telecommunications networks and facilities such as those maintained by Sprint. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.