Shryock

United States v. Shryock

Good Law
342 F.3d 948
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 4, 2003Nos. 97-50468, 97-50470, 97-50473, 97-50475, 97-50476, 97-50479, 97-50480, 97-50482, 97-50483, 97-50486, 97-50487California17,186 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Trott, J.

In these consolidated appeals, Defendants Appellants Alex Aguirre (“Aguirre”), Juan Arias (“Arias”), Daniel Barela (“Barela”), Ruben Castro (“R. Castro”), David Gallardo (“Gallardo”), Joe Hernandez (“J.Hemandez”), Ruben Hernandez (“R. Hernandez”), Raymond Mendez (“Mendez”), Jesse Moreno (“Moreno”), Raymond Shryock (“Shryock”), and Randy Therrien (“Therrien”), (collectively “Appellants”), appeal from their convictions and sentences following an eight-month jury trial. Appellants were charged with various offenses arising from their involvement with the Mexican Mafia, also know as La Erne.

The jury convicted each Appellant of a substantive violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”) under 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (c), conspiracy to violate RICO under 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (d), and — except Moreno — conspiracy to aid and abet narcotics trafficking in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 .

The jury also convicted individual Appellants of other crimes. For murder to maintain or increase their position in a RICO enterprise, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1959 (a)(1) and (2), the jury convicted Aguirre of one count, Gallardo of three counts, Shryock of one count, and Therrien…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.