Carpinteria Valley Farms, Ltd. v. County of Santa Barbara

Good Law
344 F.3d 822·2003 WL 22176120
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 25, 2003No. 01-57218California3,855 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Thompson, J.

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the opinion filed June 25, 2003, and published at 334 F.3d 796 , is amended as follows:

*824 1. Page 798, second paragraph, end of the second sentence which concludes “the County”)’ — insert the following sentence:

2. Page 798, second paragraph, clause that ends with “were not imposed on similarly situated property owners;” — insert after “owners;” a reference to footnote 1. Then, at the bottom of page 798, insert as footnote 1 the following:

3. Page 799, end of the second full paragraph that concludes with the words “permitting delays have lengthened.” — add the following sentence:

4. Page 800, after the citation to Norco Constr., Inc., in the upper, left-hand portion of the page, at the end of the paragraph, change the period to a semi-colon and add: “; Hoehne v. County of San Benito, 870 F.2d 529, 532 (9th Cir.1989).”

5. Page 802, headnote [6], line 9 of the paragraph that begins “Although the County” — delete the parenthetical that begins “e.g., restricting him from playing” and ends “develop his property.” Replace that parenthetical with:

6. Page 802, upper right-hand portion of the page, at the end of the paragraph that concludes…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.