Weber

Weber v. Shelley

Good Law
347 F.3d 1101·2003 WL 22434371
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 28, 2003No. 02-56726California2,591 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Rymer, J.

This appeal challenges the computerized touchscreen voting system that Riverside *1103 County, California, adopted to replace traditional paper ballots after the system was certified for accuracy, reliability, and feasibility by the Secretary of State of California.

Susan Marie Weber, a resident and registered voter of Riverside County, brought an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claiming that the lack of a voter-verified paper trail in the Sequoia Voting Systems AVC Edge Touchscreen Voting System that the county installed violates her rights to equal protection and due process. 1 The district court found no evidence that use of Riverside County’s touchscreen system constitutes differential treatment of voters, and concluded that use of the system does not impair Weber’s right to vote because the AVC Edge System is a reasonable choice, protects against fraud, and advances a number of important state interests. Accordingly, the court entered summary judgment for the county and state. We agree that Weber has raised at most a hypothetical concern about the ability to audit and verify election results, and that the impact on her right to vote is minimal. Therefore, we…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.