Bruce
Bruce v. Ylst
Opinion
Lead Opinion
Trott, J.
I
Vincent C. Bruce appeals the district court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of defendant prison officials in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. He argues that his submission to the court raised genuine issues of material fact with respect to his claims that when prison officials validated him as a prison gang affiliate, they did so in retaliation for his jailhouse lawyering activities and with insufficient evidence. This, he argues, violated his Fourteenth Amendment rights to due process and equal protection, and his First Amendment right to file prison grievances.
The district court had jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ; this court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . The district court granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment on all three claims. We affirm the district court as to the due process and equal protection claims. As to the First Amendment retaliation claim, we reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
II
BACKGROUND
Bruce is serving a life sentence in the California penal system. He alleges, as described below, that he has been investigated for prison gang affiliation on three occasions.