Karam

Karam v. City of Burbank

Caution
352 F.3d 1188·2003 WL 22881661
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 8, 2003Nos. 02-55954, 02-56220California3,343 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Thompson, J.

Theresa Karam regularly attended Burbank City Council meetings to express her opposition to the expansion of the Burbank airport. At one meeting, Burbank City Police Officer Shane Sindle told Karam, who had just entered the council chambers, that she would have to leave because the chambers were filled to capacity. Kar-am did not leave, and later addressed the Council. Officer Sindle submitted a police report of the incident, an investigation followed, and a misdemeanor complaint was eventually filed against Karam in state court. She was charged with delaying or obstructing a peace officer and trespassing. These charges were dismissed by the court. Karam then filed the present ac *1191 tion against the City of Burbank, city officials, police officers and deputy city attorneys, alleging federal claims under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 , 1985 and 1986, and state claims for malicious prosecution.

Karam voluntarily dismissed her claims under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1985 and 1986. The district court, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), dismissed the § 1983 claims that were predicated on an alleged violation of the Fourth Amendment, as well as the state law malicious prosecution claims.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.