Norton

Chickaloon-Moose Creek Native Ass'n v. Norton

Good Law
360 F.3d 972·2004 WL 354195
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 26, 2004No. 01-35921California6,130 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Canby, J.

The Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act of 1971 (“ANCSA”), 43 U.S.C. § 1601 et seq., extinguished all aboriginal title in Alaska and, in partial compensation, provided for Native villages to select specified acreages of land from the public domain. Id. at § 1611. The selection process ran into difficulties in the most populous area of Alaska, Cook Inlet. In 1976, the Department of the Interior (“Interior”) and Cook Inlet Region, Inc. (CIRI), an Alaska Native regional corporation, entered into an agreement, known as the Deficiency Agreement, to govern the conveyance of lands from the federal government to CIRI for reconveyance to Alaska Native village corporations within the Region. The agreement described lands eligible for conveyance in two separate appendices to the agreement: Appendix A and Appendix C. The primary issue in this case is whether, under the terms of the agreement and the statute implementing it, all of the lands listed in Appendix A must be transferred before any of the lands in Appendix C will be made available, even though the villages have selected some Appendix C lands in preference to Appendix A lands to fulfill their statutory entitlement. We conclude, as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.