Termine ex rel. Termine v. William S. Hart Union High School District

Good Law
360 F.3d 1141
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 12, 2004No. 02-56638California267 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

ORDER

The order entered on January 9, 2004 is converted to a memorandum disposition and modified as follows:

Delete the first sentence in paragraph 3: “The appellants have unnecessarily procedurally complicated the issues in this case.”

Delete the sentence in paragraph 3, line 7: “Further, the SEHO considered the stay-put issue as part of the due process hearing.”

Delete the first sentence in paragraph 4: “All critical issues have been raised and decided in the SEHO due process proceeding.”

Revise the second sentence in paragraph 4 to read: “The parties have appealed the decision in the due process hearing to the district court.”

Revise the last sentence in paragraph 4 to read: “We direct that the district court vacate its opinion that is the subject of this appeal and reconsider its opinion in light of Vashon Island Sch. Dist., the record in the appeal from the due process hearing and any additional evidence it may take at the request of the parties or either of them.”

The clerk shall depublish the order and substitute the unpublished memorandum disposition.

The panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing. Judge Wardlaw votes to deny the petition for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.