Bonnichsen

Bonnichsen v. United States

Good Law
367 F.3d 864·2004 WL 830006
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 4, 2004Nos. 02-35994, 02-35996California8,373 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Gould, J.

ORDER

The opinion published at 357 F.3d 962 (9th Cir.2004) filed on February 4, 2004 is amended so that footnote 20 should read:

With this amendment, the Petition for Rehearing is DENIED.

The full court has been advised of the Petition for Rehearing En Banc and no judge of the court has requested a vote on the Petition for Rehearing En Banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35. Appellant’s Petition for Rehearing En Banc is also DENIED.

No further petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc will be accepted in these cases.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

OPINION

This is a case about the ancient human remains of a man who hunted and lived, or at least journeyed, in the Columbia Plateau an estimated 8340 to 9200 years ago, a time predating all recorded history from any place in the world, a time before the oldest cities of our world had been founded, a time so ancient that the pristine and untouched land and the primitive cultures that may have lived on it are not deeply understood by even the most well-informed men and women of our age. Seeking the opportunity of study, a group of scientists as Plaintiffs 1 , in this case brought an action against, inter alia, the United States Department of the Interior,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.