Eden

Tucson Woman's Clinic v. Eden

Good Law
379 F.3d 531·2004 WL 1873707
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 18, 2004Nos. 02-17375, 02-17381 and 02-17382California11,514 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Thomas, J.

ORDER

The opinion filed June 18, 2004, 371 F.3d 1173 , is hereby amended as follows:

With the amendment, the Petitions for Rehearing are denied. The full court has been advised of the Petitions for Rehearing En Banc and no judge of the court has requested a vote on the Petitions for Rehearing En Banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35. Therefore, the Petitions for Rehearing En Banc are denied. No further petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc will be accepted in these cases.

OPINION

Plaintiffs in this case are physicians who provide abortions in their private medical practices in Arizona. They challenge the constitutionality of a statutory and regulatory scheme which requires the licensing and regulation of any medical facility in which five or more first trimester abortions in any month or any second or third trimester abortions are performed. The district court granted summary judgment in part to plaintiffs, and in part to defendants. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings on plaintiffs’ claim that the scheme poses an undue burdfen on the right to abortion.

I. Factual and Procedural Background

Prior to the promulgation of the statutory and regulatory…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.