Easter

Easter v. American West Financial

Good Law
381 F.3d 948·2004 WL 1936615·2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 18351
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 31, 2004No. 03-35041California6,011 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Bea, J.

I. Introduction

Washington’s usury statute prohibits ordinary lenders from making loans bearing interest rates in excess of 12%. WASH. REV. CODE § 19.52.020. However, Washington’s Consumer Loan Act (CLA) permits licensed lenders to charge interest rates up to 25% to borrowers with less than perfect credit. WASH. REV. CODE §§ 31.04.005, 31.04.035, 31.04.105. Washington also limits by statute the amount of origination fees a lender may charge. WASH. REV. CODE §§ 19.52.020, 31.04.035.

In the second-mortgage market, the identity of the actual lender is not always clear. This case deals with whether old usury laws have caught up with modern practices in lending, intermediating, discounting, and sales.

Put another way, have the brokers and lenders involved here structured their transactions so clearly that there remain no triable issues of fact whether unlicensed lenders made the loans? As discussed below, we conclude that in certain instances they have, in others they have not. However, we also conclude that on some claims in which such triable issues remain, the plaintiffs-appellants’ (Borrowers) claims are time-barred by the applicable statutes of limitation. Accordingly, we will…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.