Theis Research, Inc. v. Brown & Bain

Good Law
386 F.3d 1180·2004 WL 2348375·2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 21753
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 20, 2004No. 02-16839California2,790 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Thompson, J.

This appeal presents the primary question whether, in a case in which a party seeks to vacate an arbitration award, the amount in controversy for diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (a) is measured by the amount of the award or by the amount in dispute in the underlying litigation between the parties. The arbitration award which Theis Research, Inc. (“Theis”) moved to vacate was for zero dollars. Contemporaneously with that motion, Theis filed a complaint that sought damages from Brown & Bain (“B&B”) in excess of $200 million. The claims Theis alleged in this complaint substantially mirrored the claims it had asserted in the arbitration proceeding, which claims the arbitrator had rejected.

If we measure the amount in controversy for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (a) by the amount of the arbitration award, the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction. If we measure the amount in controversy by the amount in dispute in the underlying litigation, the district court had subject matter jurisdiction.

We conclude that the amount at stake in the underlying litigation, not the amount of the arbitration award, is the amount in controversy for purposes of diversity…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.