Parle

Parle v. Runnels

Good Law
387 F.3d 1030·2004 WL 2423691
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 1, 2004Nos. 02-16896, 02-17281California6,293 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Hall, J.

David L. Runnels, Warden of the High Desert State Prison, appeals an order of the district court granting a writ of habeas corpus to Timothy Charles Parle, a prisoner in his custody who was convicted of murder in the first degree. 1 The district court held that the California Court of Appeal unreasonably applied Supreme Court precedent regarding the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment, and that the cumulative prejudicial effect of errors at trial deprived petitioner of a fair trial in violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Petitioner cross-appeals an additional holding: that his constitutional right to testify was not violated.

We exercise jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 2241 and 2253. We REVERSE the district court, VACATE its order of relief, and REMAND for further proceedings on petitioner’s cumulative error claim. We hold that the district court did not accord appropriate deference to the state courts when it found their conclusions unreasonable. Regarding petitioner’s cross appeal, we conclude that, even assuming that the arbitrary restrictions placed on petitioner’s testimony effectively denied him his right to testify on his own behalf, any…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.