Clark v. United Emergency Animal Clinic, Inc.

Good Law
390 F.3d 1124·10 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 241·2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 25065
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 7, 2004Nos. 03-15267, 03-15269, 03-15344, 03-15347, 03-15613California1,862 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Rymer, J.

These consolidated appeals require us to decide whether veterinarians are exempted from the overtime wage requirements of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. § 207 (a)(1).

Dr. Lisa Clark and Dr. Margaret Saiki, who are veterinarians, appeal the summary judgment entered in favor of their employer, United Emergency Animal Clinic, Inc. (UEAC). 2 Under the FLSA, certain professionals are exempted from the overtime requirements if they are paid on a salary basis. 29 U.S.C. § 213 ; 29 C.F.R. § 541.3 . Additionally, certain physicians and practitioners need not be paid on a salary basis in order to be exempt from the overtime provisions of the FLSA. 29 C.F.R. § 541.314 . The district court held that doctors of veterinary medicine are within the “physicians and other practitioners” exclusion from the salary requirements for the professional exemption under the FLSA, and therefore Clark and Saiki were exempt from the FLSA overtime requirements. Clark and Saiki argue that veterinarians do not fall within this exclusion and further argue that UEAC did not meet the “salary basis” requirement of the professional exemption, though they do not dispute that their work meets all the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.