Doe
Doe v. Unocal Corp.
2003 Daily Journal DAR 1815·395 F.3d 978·2003 WL 359787·161 Oil & Gas Rep. 670·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1388
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 14, 2003Nos. 00-56603, 00-56628; D.C. Nos. CV-96-06959-RSWL, CV-96-06112-RSWLCalifornia76 words
Lead Opinion
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court, 1 *979 it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.
. Judges Wardlaw, Paez and Berzon were recused.