Pinard

Pinard v. Clatskanie School District 6J

Caution
467 F.3d 755·2006 WL 3055909
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 1, 2006No. 04-35574California7,833 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Fisher, J.

ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION

ORDER

The court sua sponte has amended the opinion filed at 446 F.3d 964 (2006). The amended opinion is filed concurrently with this order. The parties may file petitions for rehearing based on the amended opinion.

OPINION

This student speech case arises from a school district’s suspension of student athletes from its high school varsity basket *759 ball team. The students allege that the school district and various school officials violated their First Amendment free speech rights by suspending them in retaliation for speaking out against their coach. The district court granted summary judgment against the students, concluding that they were not engaged in a constitutionally protected activity because their speech did not involve a matter of public concern. In the alternative, the court concluded that the school district could constitutionally punish the students because their decision not to board a team bus and play in a regularly scheduled out-of-town game substantially and materially interfered with a school activity.

We hold that the district court erred in adopting from the government employment context the public concern standard for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.