Freitag

Freitag v. Ayers

Good Law
468 F.3d 528
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 13, 2006Nos. 03-16702, 03-17184, 03-17398California9,030 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Reinhardt, J.

ORDER AMENDING OPINION AND AMENDED OPINION

ORDER

The opinion filed September 13, 2006, slip op. 11183, and appearing at 463 F.3d 838 (9th Cir.2006), is hereby amended as follows:

With these amendments, the panel has voted to deny the petitions for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge of the court has requested a vote on it. The petitions for rehearing and rehearing en banc are DENIED. No further petitions for rehearing or rehearing en banc may be filed.

OPINION

May a state department of corrections be held liable for prison officials’ failure to correct a hostile work environment that is the result of male prisoners’ sexual harassment of female guards? We answer that question, “Yes.”

The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) and three Pelican Bay State Prison (Pelican Bay) administrators appeal a judgment in favor of Deanna Freitag, a former correctional officer in the prison’s Secure Housing Unit. Freitag alleged that the CDCR and Pelican Bay were delinquent in addressing the sexually hostile environment created by prison inmates — particularly in confronting the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.