People v. Coleman CA4/1

STATEMENT OF FACTS

This appeal is from a guilty plea. Coleman admitted he possessed a firearm as a convicted felon.

DISCUSSION

As we have noted, appellate counsel has filed a Wende brief and asks the court to review the record. To assist the court in its review, and in compliance with Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 (Anders), counsel has identified the following possible issues which were considered in evaluating the potential merits of this appeal: 1. Did the court err in denying Coleman’s motion to strike the prior conviction (Romero motion)? 2. Did the court err in accepting Coleman’s guilty plea when he was not physically present in court? We have reviewed the entire record as required by Wende and Anders. We have not discovered any arguable issues for reversal on appeal. Competent counsel has represented Coleman on this appeal.

2

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

HUFFMAN, Acting P. J.

WE CONCUR:

O’ROURKE, J.

BUCHANAN, J.

3