Miller v. Farmers Insurance Exchange

Good Law
481 F.3d 1119
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 26, 2006Nos. 05-35080, 05-35082, 05-35145, 05-35146, 05-35501, 05-35509California6,155 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Silverman, J.

ORDER AMENDING OPINION AND AMENDED OPINION

ORDER

The Opinion filed October 26, 2006, slip op. 17921, and appearing at 466 F.3d 853 (9th Cir.2006), is amended as follows:

With these amendments, the panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc.

The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 35.

The petition for panel rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED. No further petitions shall be entertained.

OPINION

For more than 50 years, the Department of Labor has considered claims adjusters exempt from the Fair Labor Standard Act’s overtime requirement. In 2004, the DOL promulgated 29 C.F.R. § 541.203 , which it viewed as “consistent with” existing law. Section 541.203 exempts claims adjusters if they perform activities such as interviewing witnesses, making recommendations regarding coverage and value of claims, determining fault and negotiating settlements.

In this case, the plaintiffs are nearly 2,000 former and current claims adjusters who handle, respectively, automobile damage claims,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.