Ruthenbeck

Earth Island Institute v. Ruthenbeck

Good Law
490 F.3d 687·2007 WL 1651422
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 10, 2006Nos. 05-16975, 05-17078California4,825 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Schroeder, J.

ORDER

The panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing. Chief Judge Schroeder and Judge Graber have voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Duffy has so recommended.

The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and no judge of the court has requested a vote on it.

The petitions for rehearing and rehearing en bane are DENIED.

Plaintiffs-Appellees’ motion for clarification with regard to the applicability of the opinion to both 36 C.F.R. §§ 215.12 (f) and 215.4(a) and inapplicability of the opinion to 36 C.F.R. § 215.18 (b)(1) is GRANTED.

The opinion at Earth Island Institute v. Ruthenbeck, 459 F.3d 954 (9th Cir.2006), is amended and, in the interest of clarity, the attached amended opinion is substituted in its place.

No further petitions for rehearing or rehearing en banc may be filed.

AMENDED OPINION

I. Overview

This is a government appeal from a district court judgment enjoining Forest Service regulations that govern review of decisions implementing forest plans, on the ground that the regulations were manifestly contrary to the governing statute. The Forest Service promulgated the challenged regulations pursuant to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.