Pulido
Pulido v. Chrones
559 F.3d 1040·2009 WL 723989·2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 5825
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 20, 2009Nos. 05-15916, 05-16308California89 words
Lead Opinion
ORDER
In light of Hedgpeth v. Pulido, 555 U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 530 , — L.Ed.2d — *1041 (2008), which vacated the judgment of this court, 487 F.3d 669 , and remanded, we in turn remand this case to the district court for further proceedings in accordance with the Supreme Court’s determination that the appropriate standard of review in a case under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 is harmless error, rather than structural error, when a jury is instructed on alternative theories of guilt.
REMANDED.