Alcazar

Alcazar v. Corporation of the Catholic Archbishop

Good Law
598 F.3d 668·2010 WL 917200·108 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1416·15 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1670·2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 5356
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 16, 2010No. 09-35003California3,560 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Beezer, J.

“The First Amendment has erected a wall between church and state. That wall must be kept high and impregnable. We could not approve the slightest breach.” Everson v. Bd. of Educ., 330 U.S. 1, 18 , 67 S.Ct. 504 , 91 L.Ed. 711 (1947). The interplay between the First Amendment’s Free Exercise and Establishment Clauses creates an exception to an otherwise fully applicable statute if the statute would interfere with a religious organization’s employment decisions regarding its ministers. Bollard v. Cal. Province of the Soc’y of Jesus, 196 F.3d 940 , 944, 946-47 (9th Cir.1999). This “ministerial exception” helps to preserve the wall between church and state from even the mundane government intrusion presented here. In this case, plaintiff Cesar Rosas seeks pay for the overtime hours he worked as a seminarian in a Catholic church in Washington. The district court correctly determined that the ministerial exception bars Rosas’s claim and dismissed the case on the pleadings. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , 1 and we affirm.

I

Cesar Rosas and Jesus Alcazar were Catholic seminarians in Mexico. The Catholic Church required them to participate in a ministry training program at…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.