Ojo

Ojo v. Farmers Group, Inc.

Good Law
600 F.3d 1201·2010 WL 1407846·2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 9052
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 9, 2010No. 06-55522California1,712 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

ORDER

The per curiam opinion filed on April 9, 2010, and the order certifying a question to the Supreme Court of Texas, filed on April 9, 2010, are AMENDED as follows.

The caption states:

The word “Attorney” and the following comma is deleted so that the revised caption states:

It is so ORDERED.

ORDER

We respectfully certify to the Supreme Court of Texas the question of law set forth in this order, pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 58. The question of law is determinative of the matter pending before this court, and there is no clearly controlling precedent in the decisions of the Supreme Court of Texas.

I

We summarize the material facts: Patrick O. Ojo is an African-American resident of Texas and the owner of a homeowner’s property-and-casualty policy issued by Farmers Group, Inc. (“Farmers”), a Nevada Corporation that maintains its headquarters in Los Angeles, California. In January 2004, Farmers increased Ojo’s homeowner’s insurance premium by nine percent even though he had made no prior claims on the policy. Farmers allegedly told Ojo that the increase was due to unfavorable credit information obtained through the company’s automated credit-scoring…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.