Buckingham

Buckingham v. Secretary of the U.S. Department of Agriculture

Good Law
603 F.3d 1073·40 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20131·2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 8890
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 29, 2010No. 09-15893California6,958 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Smith, J.

Plaintiff Kenneth R. Buckingham filed a complaint in the District of Nevada against the Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture, the Chief of the United States Forest Service, the Regional Forester for the Intermountain Region, the Forest Supervisor for the HumboldtToiyabe National Forest, and the District Ranger for the Santa Rosa Ranger District (collectively, the Forest Service). Buckingham sought judicial review, pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), of the Forest Service’s decision to cancel his permit to graze cattle in the Santa Rosa Ranger District of the Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest, claiming, inter alia, that the Forest Service: (1) erroneously enforced a permit lacking clearly defined pasture boundaries; (2) violated Buckingham’s Fifth Amendment procedural due process rights by not affording him adequate pre- or post-deprivation procedures; (3) failed to give him notice and an opportunity to demonstrate or achieve compliance as required by the APA, 5 U.S.C. § 558 (c); and (4) improperly considered Buckingham’s prior history of non-compliance with his permit in making its decision. The district court upheld the Forest Service’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.