Franco

Franco v. Dow Chemical Co.

Good Law
611 F.3d 1027·2010 WL 2735731·77 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 332·2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 14292
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 13, 2010Nos. 08-80090, 03-57038California17,822 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

ORDER

The court’s published order, filed July 13, 2010, is amended as follows:

ORDER

We must decide the appropriate discipline in the case of respondents Thomas V. Girardi, Walter J. Lack, Paul A. Traina, and a junior associate in Lack’s firm. Respondents attempted to enforce a putative foreign judgment for $489 million in district court but failed. They undertook and maintained an appeal to this court although they knew, at least by the time defendants filed a motion to supplement the record in this court, that the document they offered as evidence of that judgment was spurious.

1. Background,

The factual and procedural background of the case is complicated but essentially uncontested. 1 Respondents Thomas V. Girardi and Walter J. Lack are Los Angeles-based lawyers who have practiced law together for 25 years, while maintaining separate firms. They are highly experienced and highly successful practitioners. Typically, in the cases they take on jointly, Girardi and Lack divide responsibilities between their respective law firms, Girardi & Keese (the “Girardi Firm”) and Engstrom, Lipscomb & Lack (the “Lack Firm”). In some cases, the Girardi Firm has the primary responsibility;…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.